JDSE

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Digital literacy and computer self-efficacy among dental students and faculty members
Aim: This study aimed to examine the digital literacy and computer self-efficacy of faculty members and undergraduate students in dental education and to investigate their associations with demographic and technology-related characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional survey included 102 undergraduate dental students and all 12 faculty members employed at the institution during the study period. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, Questionnaire for Determining Prospective Teachers’ Digital Literacy Levels, and Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, Welch’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance, non-parametric tests, correlation analyses, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed as appropriate. Results: Male students had higher digital literacy and computer self-efficacy scores than female students, whereas no significant differences were observed between age groups. Personal computer ownership and previous computer-related training were associated with higher scores on both outcomes. In the multivariable analyses, gender, personal computer ownership, and previous computer-related training remained significantly associated with both digital literacy and computer self-efficacy after adjustment for age, grade level, and frequency of internet use. Grade level was not independently associated with either outcome after adjustment. Faculty members had higher digital literacy and computer self-efficacy scores than students. Digital literacy and computer self-efficacy were strongly positively correlated among students, whereas no statistically significant association was identified among faculty members. Conclusions: Digital literacy and computer self-efficacy among dental students were associated with gender, access to a personal computer, and previous computer-related training. These findings support the integration of structured technology-supported learning opportunities into dental education while emphasizing that the observed associations should not be interpreted causally.


1. Çetin O, Güngör B. Computer self-efficacy beliefs of primary school teachers and their attitudes towards computer-aided instruction. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ J Fac Edu. 2014;33(1):55-77. doi:10.7822/omuefd.214866
2. Kır Ş. The evolving roles of higher education institutions and academic staff in the digital transformation process. J Open Edu Appl Res. 2020;6(3):143-163.
3. Kaleci D. Digital literacy. In: Aydemir H, Ciğerci FM, Karalı Y, eds. Teacher Skills in the 21st Century. Nobel Academic Publishing; 2022:169-182.
4. Erdamar G, Barası M. Secondary school Turkish course curriculum in terms of 21st century skills. J Turk Edu Sci. 2021;19(1):312-342. doi:10.37217/tebd.868788
5. Özkaya Y, Erat V. Digital literacy studies in Turkey: literature-based qualitative research. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Univ J Soc Sci. 2022;12:240-256. doi:10.30783/nevsosbilen.1124953
6. Özek Yakut B, Sincer S. Digital transformation in higher education: integration of online and hybrid practices into traditional education systems. J Int Lang Literat Cult Histor Art Edu Res. 2024;14:1170-1193. doi:10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1426337
7. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly. 1995;19(2):189-211. doi:10.2307/249688
8. Deniz L, Algan C. Validity and reliability studies of the information and communication technologies (ICT) self-efficacy scale in education. Marmara Univ Atatürk Fac Edu J Edu Sci. 2013;25(25):87-107.
9. Timur B, Yılmaz Ş, Timur S. Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards computer use. Mersin Univ J Fac Edu. 2013;9(1):165-174.
10. Adıyaman M, Sert H. An investigation on teacher candidates’ self-efficacy perceptions and attitudes towards computer aided education. Akdeniz J Edu. 2018;1(2):189-216.
11. Karaçor K. Digital Measurement Systems and Workflow. Master’s thesis. İstanbul University Faculty of Dentistry; 2021.
12. Özdoğan A, Tursun B. Evaluation of dentistry graduate students’ views on postgraduate education and digital dentistry. Selcuk Dent J. 2022;9(1):83-87. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.886368
13. Uyar A. Digital literacy of associate degree students. Int J Contempor Edu Stud. 2021;7(1):198-211.
14. Nassani LM, Bencharit S, Schumacher F, Lu WE, Resende R, Fernandes GVO. The impact of technology teaching in the dental predoctoral curriculum on students’ perception of digital dentistry. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(3):75. doi:10.3390/dj12030075
15. Alhamed FJ, Neiva GF, Bak SY, Karl E, Inglehart MR. Pre-doctoral dental students’ computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-related education, knowledge, attitudes and behavior: a national survey. J Dent Educ. 2023;87(4):562-571. doi:10.1002/jdd.13144
16. Liu CM, Hsu MH, Ng MY, Yu CH. Digital integration in dental education: a novel self-directed learning model using intraoral scanners for tooth preparation training. J Dent Sci. 2025;20(1):639-645. doi:10. 1016/j.jds.2024.10.030
17. Zitzmann NU, Matthisson L, Ohla H, Joda T. Digital undergraduate education in dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3269. doi:10.3390/ijerph17093269
18. Das S, Jha K, Menon I, Kumar G, Singh A, Barman D. Application of digitalization in dental education-a systematic review. Indian J Dent Res. 2024;35(4):470-477. doi:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_883_23
19. Shooriabi M, KaabOmeir F, Modarres Mousavi S, Amjadi M. Digital literacy competence among dental students: an assessment using a DigComp 2.2-based instrument. BMC Med Educ. 2026;26:393. doi:10.1186/s12909-026-08916-2
20. Özmen B, Ceyhan A. Virtual reality applications in dentistry. NEU Dent J. 2023;5(3):224-231. doi:10.51122/neudentj.2023.81
21. Tuncer M, Tanaş R. Evaluation of the computer self-efficacy perceptions of students from faculty of education. Adıyaman Univ J Instit Soc Sci. 2011;(6):222-232.
22. Yılmaz E, Kavak A. Evaluation of information literacy self-efficacy of university students: the case of Kırıkkale University. Informat Manag. 2024;7(2):348-374. doi:10.33721/by.1560442
23. Ceylan G, Eken MO, Yuruk S, Emir F. Examining the influence of self-esteem and digital literacy on professional competence factors in dental education: a cross-sectional study. Appl Sci. 2023;13(16):9411. doi:10.3390/app13169411
24. Erdem AR, Okul Ö. Primary school teachers’ communication skills with students. J Contempor Administrat Sci. 2015;2(1):1-8.
25. Akyildiz S, Yurtbakan E, Tok R. The evaluation of primary school teachers’ of 2023’s education vision views on the politics about their professional development. J Nat Edu Bind. 2019;48(1):827-852.
26. Kıyıcı M. Determining the Digital Literacy Levels of Prospective Teachers. Doctoral thesis. Anadolu University; 2008.
27. Şensoy Ö. The relationship between primary school teachers’ computer self-efficacy perceptions and their beliefs regarding the benefits of computer-assisted instruction. Master’s thesis. Yıldız Technical University Institute of Social Sciences; 2004.
28. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
29. Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial Intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res. 2020;99(7):769-774. doi:10.1177/0022034520915714
30. Zahid TM, Agou S. E-learning readiness among dental students and faculty: a comparative study before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1306205. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1306205
31. Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Record. 2006;108(6):1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
32. Koehler MJ, Mishra P. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contempor Issu Technol Teach Edu. 2009;9(1):60-70.
33. Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
34. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman; 1997.
35. Hatlevik OE, Gu?mundsdóttir GB, Loi M. Digital diversity among upper secondary students: a multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Comput Educ. 2015;81:345-353. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.019
36. Tsai MJ, Tsai C-C. Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy. Innovat Edu Teach Int. 2003;40(1):43-50. doi:10.1080/1355800032000038822
37. Sikka N, Arya L, Bala S, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and perception of undergraduate dental students on information and communication technology and computer-assisted learning. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;16(5):711-715. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2663
38. Towers A, Field J, Stokes C, Maddock S, Martin N. A scoping review of the use and application of virtual reality in pre-clinical dental education. Br Dent J. 2019;226(5):358-366. doi:10.1038/s41415-019-0041-0
39. Cooper J. The digital divide: the special case of gender. J Comput Assist Learn. 2006;22(5):320-334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
40. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Int J Learn Futur. 2001;9(5):1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
41. Ng W. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput Educ. 2012; 59(3):1065-1078. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
42. Helsper EJ, Eynon R. Digital natives: where is the evidence? Br Educ Res J. 2010;36(3):503-520. doi:10.1080/01411920902989227
43. Ferrari A. DIGCOMP: a framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union; 2013.
44. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press; 1991.
45. Kraemer-Fernandez P, Spintzyk S, Wahl E, Huettig F, Klink A. Implementation of a full digital workflow by 3D printing intraoral splints used in dental education: an exploratory observational study with respect to students’ experiences. Dent J (Basel). 2022;11(1):5. doi:10.3390/dj11010005
46. Mwogosi A, Mambile C, Simba R, Haruna H. Integrating digital technologies in clinical dentistry training: a framework for competency-based education. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):1645. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07585-x
47. Gülşen İT, Yıldız Gökşen EG, Gökşen ET, Aşar EM, Meşe A. Digital dentistry among clinical-year dental students: awareness, attitudes, and curriculum expectations. BMC Med Educ. 2026. doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09901-5
48. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
49. van Dijk JAGM. Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics. 2006;34(4-5):221-235. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
50. Bayazıt A, Ozturk Bayazit E. Digital divide affects oral and dental health students’ preferences during COVID-19 outbreak: a comparison of distance and face-to-face education. Eur Ann Dent Sci. 2023;50(3):100-105. doi:10.52037/eads.2023.0024
Volume 4, Issue 3, 2026
Page : 105-118
_Footer