JDSE

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Success rate of apical resection: a retrospective evaluation of associated factors
Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term success rate of apical resection procedures and to explore factors potentially associated with treatment outcomes under routine clinical conditions.
Methods: Clinical records of patients who underwent apical resection at a single academic center between January 2015 and January 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables, tooth characteristics, root-end filling materials, and operator type were recorded. Treatment outcome was assessed based on the absence of clinical symptoms and radiographic reduction in periapical lesion size. Preoperative and follow-up periapical radiographs were calibrated and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical analyses included chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Mann–Whitney U tests, and variables showing potential associations were further explored.
Results: A total of 357 apical resection cases were included, with a mean follow-up period of 72 months (range: 18–120 months). Successful healing was observed in the majority of cases. Differences in outcomes were observed according to root-end filling material and operator type, whereas no apparent associations were noted with patient sex, age, or jaw location.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, apical resection demonstrated a satisfactory long-term outcome under routine clinical conditions. Treatment outcomes appeared to be influenced by procedural and operator-related factors, underscoring the importance of appropriate material selection and surgical expertise in apical surgery.


1. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Root canal microbiota of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(11):3599-3606. doi:10.1128/JCM.00431-08
2. Setzer FC, Shah SB, Kohli MR, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature-part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2010;36(11):1757-1765. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.007
3. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod. 2006;32(7):601-623. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010
4. von Arx T, Walker WA III. Microsurgical instruments for root-end cavity preparation following apicoectomy: a literature review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16(2):47-62. doi:10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016002047.x
5. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod. 2013;39(3):332-339. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044
6. Tang Y, Xu K, Chen Y, Lu L. Evaluating the efficacy of endodontic microsurgery for teeth with an undeveloped root apex and periapical periodontitis after nonsurgical treatment failure. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:414. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03117-5
7. Zheng C, Wu W, Zhang Y, Tang Z, Xie Z, Chen Z. A novel simplified approach for endodontic retrograde surgery in short single-rooted teeth. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:150. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-03879-6
8. Pinto D, Marques A, Pereira JF, Palma PJ, Santos JM. Long-term prognosis of endodontic microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(9):447. doi:10.3390/medicina56090447
9. Rud J, Molven O. Periapical healing after endodontic surgery. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972;30(4):395-404.
10. Rud J, Molven O. Prognosis of teeth subjected to apical surgery. Int Endod J. 1990;23(1):1-13.
11. von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hänni S, Friedman S. Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2012;38(5):570-579. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.002
12. Setzer FC, Kohli MR, Shah SB, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature-part 2: comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification. J Endod. 2012;38(1):1-10. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.021
13. Kaur IP, Sroa RB, Debbarma M, Pallawi S, Kumar A. Outcome assessment of three different methods of root-end preparation and filling materials in endodontic surgery: a comparative clinical prospective study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2024;15(2):77-83. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_570_23
14. Tok S, Ayrancı LB. Examination of the bond strength of retrograde filling in teeth with failed apical resection after retreatment: effect of tungsten carbide burs versus ultrasonic retro-tips. Appl Sci. 2025;15(7):3441. doi:10.3390/app15073441
15. Ørstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J. 1996;29(3):150-155. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01361.x
16. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival. Int Endod J. 2011;44(7):610-625. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01873.x
17. Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Walton RE. Timing of follow-up after endodontic treatment. Int Endod J. 2009;42(4):289-298.
18. Rud J, Molven O. Prognosis of root resection. Int J Oral Surg. 1973;2(3):131-144.
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2026
Page : 51-55
_Footer