1. Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS. New resins for dental composites. J Dent Res. 2017;96(10):1085-1091. doi:10.1177/0022034517720658.
2. Badami V, Ahuja B. Biosmart materials: breaking new ground in dentistry. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:986912. doi:10.1155/2014/986912
3. Nayyer M, Zahid S, Hassan SH, et al. Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(01):057-066. doi:10.4103/ejd.ejd_380_17
4. Naz F, Yousaf O, Chattha MR, Raza SM. Preference regarding technique selection for posterior composite restorations among the dentists in Lahore. Pak Oral Dent J. 2015;35(3).
5. Samanta S, Das UK, Mitra A. Comparison of microleakage in class V cavity restored with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention N. Imp J Interdiscip Res. 2017;3(8):180-183.
6. Jayaratne YSN, Zwahlen RA. The evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119503. doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0119503
7. Mutlu-Sagesen H, Sagesen EA. Evolution of esthetic publications in dentistry, research trends, and global productivity: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Prosthod. 2024;37(3). doi:10.11607/ijp.8159
8. Rocha MdNO, Dos Santos GMS, Dos Anjos LM, et al. Global mapping of publications on bulk-fill techniques and composite resins in dentistry: an altmetric and bibliometric analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. doi:10. 1016/j.prosdent.2025.09.025
9. Matoug-Elwerfelli M, Daud A, Ali K, Abdou A. Virtual reality in restorative dentistry: a bibliometric analysis of research trends. BDJ Open. 2025;11(1):77. doi:10.1038/s41405-025-00364-2
10. Li S, Zhao D, Chen J, He L, Hu S, Zhang W. Bibliometric analysis of research trends in early orthodontic treatment: a two-decade perspective (2000-2025). Journal of Orofac Orthop. 2025:1-14. doi:10.1007/s00056-025-00604-y
11. Ahmad P, Slots J. A bibliometric analysis of periodontology. Periodontol 2000. 2021;85(1):237-240. doi:10.1111/prd.12376
12. Naz F, Khan AS, Kader MA, et al. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(7):666-673. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012
13. Gülek E, Aslan Ö, Özdoğan A. A bibliometric analysis of the research trends of resin cements in dentistry. Curr Res Dent Sci. 2025;35(4):331-335. doi:10.17567/currresdentsci.1422975
14. Rai N, Shetty S, Gupta R. Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of Cention N and glass ionomer cements in open-sandwich class II restorations-an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2023;15(1):113-118. doi: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_234_21
15. Bonchev A, Bogovska-Gigova R. Alkasites in restorative dentistry: a review of their performance and properties. J Dent. 2025:105916. doi:10. 1016/j.jdent.2025.105916
16. Sharma H, Suprabha B, Shenoy R, Rao A, Kotian H. Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023;24(3):301-311. doi:10.1007/s40368-023-00788-0
17. Mehta A, Deka BP, Mathur MR. Qualitative research in oral health in India: a bibliometric analysis. JOBCR. 2026;16(1):23-44. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.11.001
18. Qasim SSB, Ali D, Khan AS, Rehman SU, Iqbal A, Baskaradoss JK. Evidence-based bibliometric analysis of research on silver diamine fluoride use in dentistry. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021(1):9917408. doi:10. 1155/2021/9917408
19. Adnan S, Lal A, Naved N, Umer F. A bibliometric analysis of scientific literature in digital dentistry from low-and lower-middle income countries. BDJ Open. 2024;10(1):38. doi:10.1038/s41405-024-00225-4
20. Yasin ET, Erturk M, Tassoker M, Koklu M. Deep learning applications in dentistry: a bibliometric review analysis and mapping (2014-2024). Iran J Comput Sci. 2025;8(2):253-270. doi:10.1007/s42044-024-00226-4
21. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C. A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited case reports and case series in dentistry. Eur Oral Res. 2026;60(1):18. doi:10.26650/eor.20251569367
22. Halboub ES. A Bibliometric Analysis of Dental Research on Xerostomia and Hyposalivation. JCDP. 2025;26(6):615-622. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3909
23. Praveen G, Pasupuleti MK, Penmetsa GS, Nagisetti H, Indukuri SD, Akkaloori A. Systematic reviews in dental research: a bibliometric analysis of contribution from Indian dentists during 1948-2022. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(5):571-576. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_127_22
24. Demirci M, Karabay F, Tuncer S, Tekçe N, Berkman M. 101 Top-cited dentistry articles from Turkey: a bibliometric analysis. Meandros Med Dental J. 2021;22(Special Issue of Dentistry):8-23. doi:10.4274/meandros.galenos.2020.59023
25. Khuva H, Kurup D, Mahreen S, Mukherjee T, Tikadar S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of different restorative materials-an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 4):S3818-S3820. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1174_24
26. Kini A, Shetty S. Microleakage evaluation of an alkasite restorative material: an in vitro dye penetration study. JCDP. 2019;20(11):1315-1318.
27. Awad MM, Alshehri T, Alqarni AM, et al. Evaluation of the bond strength and cytotoxicity of alkasite restorative material. Appl Sci. 2020; 10(18):6175. doi:10.3390/app10186175
28. Sulimany AM, Aldowsari MK, Bin Saleh S, Alotaibi SS, Alhelal BM, Hamdan HM. An In vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of alkasite restorative material in primary molars compared with glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Materials. 2024;17(24):6230. doi:10.3390/ma17246230
29. Chen Y, Yeung AW, Pow EH, Tsoi JK. Current status and research trends of lithium disilicate in dentistry: a bibliometric analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(4):512-522. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.012