JDSE

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Comparing haptic enhanced virtual reality simulation to plastic manikin local anesthesia training: an in-situ evaluation
Aims: The inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is a common injection in dentistry and requires precise motor and anatomical skills. Traditional local anesthesia training methods, plastic manikins (PMLA), often fall short, particularly in visualizing hidden anatomy, which can hinder student confidence and performance during live procedures. Virtual reality local anesthesia (VRLA) simulations offer visual advantages but typically lack realistic tactile feedback. This study evaluated a custom haptic-enhanced VR system (H-VRLA) designed to address this gap.
Methods: A mixed-method, two-group, pre and post simulation design assessed the usability and effectiveness of the H-VRLA (n=31) versus PMLA (n=30) in preparing students (N=61) for peer-to-peer IANB injections. Participants completed a pre and post simulation survey and knowledge assessment, rotated simulation methods, delivered peer-to-peer injections and took a survey. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: Prior to simulation training, students exhibited low baseline knowledge with no significant differences between groups. Post-intervention, both groups showed a statistically significant increase in knowledge test scores and confidence ratings, but only H-VRLA achieved a statistically reliable gain in Final Scores. In a comparison of training realism, PMLA method was rated significantly higher for procedural features (e.g., holding the syringe, retracting the cheek), while the H-VRLA method was rated higher for visually locating anatomy. H-VRLA rated "Anatomy Helped" significantly higher. This high perceived helpfulness was a strong predictor of their final performance (R2=0.26). In contrast, for PMLA, the final score was not predicted by the helpfulness rating; instead, initial confidence was the sole strong predictor of final confidence.
Conclusion: Both simulation methods effectively supported learning. H-VRLA excelled in anatomical visualization, while PMLA was superior for realistic tactile experience. A hybrid approach is recommended, and future H-VRLA development should focus on enhancing bimanual haptics and tactile realism to better support skill transfer to live practice.


1. Al-Saud LM, Mushtaq F, Allsop MJ, et al. Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. Eur J Dent Educ. 2017;21(4): 240-247. doi:10.1111/eje.12214
2. Eid M, Levine M, Gyawali A, McAlpin E. (2024) A custom haptic syringe to improve a VR local anesthesia simulation for foundational dental education: a feasibility study. Open J Applied Sciences. 2024;14:3460-3479. doi:10.4236/ojapps.2024.1412226.
3. Xia P, Lopes AM, Restivo MT. Virtual reality and haptics for dental surgery: a personal review. The Visual Computer. 2013;29:433-447. doi: 10.1007/s00371-012-0748-2
4. Cox MJ, Quinn BF, San Diego JP, Patel J, Gawali K, Woolford M. Innovations in teaching and learning strategies to improve the effectiveness of using haptic simulators in higher education for dental students and other health care disciplines. In IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2017;(pp. 387-397).
5. Al-Saud LM. The utility of haptic simulation in early restorative dental training: a scoping review. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(5):704-721. doi:10.1002/jdd.12518
6. Cohen J. The effect size. Cohen L. (Ed.) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group). 1988:77-83.
7. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Am J Qualitative Res. 2022;6(1):232-237. doi:10.29333/ajqr/12085
8. Lee JS, Graham R, Bassiur JP, Lichtenthal RM. Evaluation of a local anesthesia simulation model with dental students as novice clinicians. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(12):1411-1417.
9. Knipfer C, Rohde M, Oetter N, Muench T, Kesting MR, Stelzle F. Local anaesthesia training for undergraduate students-how big is the step from model to man? BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):308. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1389-6
10. Buchanan JA. Experience with virtual reality-based technology in teaching restorative dental procedures. J Dent Educ. 2004;68(12):1258-1265. doi:10.1002/j.0022-337.2004.68.12.tb03875.x
11. Quinn F, Keogh P, McDonald A, Hussey D. A study comparing the effectiveness of conventional training and virtual reality simulation in the skills acquisition of junior dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003;7(4):164-169. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00309.x
12. Collaço E, Kira E, Sallaberry LH, et al. Immersion and haptic feedback impacts on dental anesthesia technical skills virtual reality training. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(4):589-598. doi:10.1002/jdd.12503
13. Lamira JM, Wilson CS, Leppek NC, Orr CM, De la Rosa LM, Greany TJ. A pilot study of local anesthesia training using a mixed-reality haptic fidelity model. J Dent Educ. 2023;87(4):583-591. doi:10.1002/jdd.13151
Volume 4, Issue 1, 2026
Page : 1-10
_Footer