JDSE

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

EndNote Style
Index
Review
Use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in prosthodontics
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance material that stands out among semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymers. Due to its chemical and physical durability, biocompatibility, and elastic modulus similar to that of human bone, it has become increasingly popular in dentistry. PEEK can be used in inlay, onlay, and endocrown restorations; as substructures for crowns and bridges; in removable denture frameworks; as an implant material; in implant-supported fixed or removable prostheses; and in the fabrication of occlusal splints. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current literature on the structure, properties, and use of PEEK material in prosthetic dentistry, which has recently become widely used, and to discuss its advantages and limitations compared to alternative materials.


1. Zimmermanna, M, Mehlb, A, Reichc, S. New CAD/CAM materials and blocks for chairside procedures. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16:173-181.
2. Sevinç EH, İnal CB, Aydın C. Protetik diş hekimliğinde polietereterketon materyalinin yeri. ADO Klin Bil Derg. 2022;11(2):176-183. doi:10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.956409
3. Kurtz, SM. An overview of PEEK biomaterials. Kurtz, SM, editor. PEEK biomaterials handbook. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2019. p. 1-7.
4. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CH, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater. 2010;26(6):553-559. doi:10. 1016/j.dental.2010.02.003
5. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(1):12-19. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001
6. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(4):383-392. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a32570
7. Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34(9):e246-e254. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.004
8. Skirbutis G, Dzingute A, Masiliunaite V, Šulcaite G, Zilinskas J. PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics: a review. Stomatologija. 2018;20(2):54-58.
9. Seferli Z, Sarıdağ S. PEEK polimerinin dişhekimliğinde kullanımı. Selcuk Dent J. 2020;7(2):354-363. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.476586
10. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The use of a modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(7): 580-584. doi:10.1111/jopr.12325
11. Güneş F, Kocacıklı M, Korkmaz T. Dental implantolojide polietereterketon (PEEK): geleneksel derleme. Selcuk Dent J. 2023;10(3): 611-617. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1238899
12. Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Dent Mater. 2012;28(12):1280-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010
13. Külünk T, Külünk Ş, Saraç D. Diş hekimliği uygulamalarında polietereterketon. Turk Klin Prosthodont Spec Topics. 2017;3(3):175-183.
14. Fueki K, Ohkubo C, Yatabe M, et al. Clinical application of removable partial dentures using thermoplastic resin-part I: definition and indication of non-metal clasp dentures. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(1):3-10. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2013.12.002
15. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater. 2012;28(3):273-278. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.016
16. Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Borges ALS, et al. Effect of different materials and undercut on the removal force and stress distribution in circumferential clasps during direct retainer action in removable partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2020;36(2):179-186. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019. 11.022
17. Chen X, Mao B, Zhu Z, et al. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for 4 removable partial denture designs with 3 framework materials: CoCr, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and PEEK. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13975. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50363-1
18. Ye H, Wang Z, Sun Y, Zhou Y. Fully digital workflow for the design and manufacture of prostheses for maxillectomy defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(2):257-261. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.026
19. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, et al. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101(7):1209-1216. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32932
20. Bechir ES, Bechir A, Gioga C, Manu R, Burcea A, Dascalu IT. The advantages of BioHPP polymer as superstructure material in oral implantology. Mater Plast. 2016;53(3):394-398.
21. Bağkur M, Nadırov M, Akçaboy C. Kumlamanın polietereterketon ve rezin siman bağlantı dayanımına etkisi. Sağl Akad Kastamonu. 2020; 5(3):170-180. doi:10.25279/sak.630863
22. Biris C, Bechir ES, Bechir A, et al. Evaluations of two reinforced polymers used as metal-free substructures in fixed dental restorations. Mater Plast. 2018;55(1):33-37.
23. Rocha RF, Anami LC, Campos TM, Melo RM, Souza RO, Bottino MA. Bonding of the polymer polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to human dentin: effect of surface treatments. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(6):693-699. doi:10. 1590/0103-6440201600796
24. Wimmer T, Huffmann AMS, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dent Mater. 2016;32(6):e127-e136. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.005
25. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, et al. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1278-1288. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014
26. Ortega-Martínez J, Farré-Lladós M, Cano-Batalla J, Cabratosa-Termes J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a medical and dental material: a literature review. Med Res Arch. 2017;5(4):1-16. doi:10.18103/mra.v5i4. 1209
27. Rabiei A, Sandukas S. Processing and evaluation of bioactive coatings on polymeric implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101(9):2621-2629. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34557
28. Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of polyetheretherketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100(4):1044-1052. doi:10.1002/jbm.b. 32669
29. Sarot JR, Contar CM, Cruz AC, de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(7): 2079-2085. doi:10.1007/s10856-010-4084-7
30. Neumann EAF, Villar CC, França FM. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:S1806-8324201 4000100239. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0028
31. Koutouzis T, Richardson J, Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(2):174-182. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00102.1
32. Sharaf MY, Eskander A, Afify M. Novel PEEK retentive elements versus conventional retentive elements in mandibular overdentures: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:6947756. doi:10.1155/ 2022/6947756
33. Emera RM, Altonbary GY, Elbashir SA. Comparison between all zirconia, all PEEK, and zirconia-PEEK telescopic attachments for two implants retained mandibular complete overdentures: In vitro stress analysis study. J Dent Implants. 2019;9(1):24-29. doi:10.4103/jdi.jdi_6_19
34. Costa-Palau S, Torrents-Nicolas J, Brufau-de Barberà M, Cabratosa-Terme J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):680-682. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.026
35. Elfahl BN, Mostafa TMN. Polyetheretherketone custom CAD-CAM splint for treatment of periodontally affected mobile anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(2):210-212. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.031
36. Benli M, Eker Gümüş B, Kahraman Y, et al. Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers. Odontology. 2020;108(2):240-250. doi:10.1007/s10266-019-00463-1
37. Wang S, Li Z, Ye H, Zhao W, Liu Y, Zhou Y. Preliminary clinical evaluation of traditional and a new digital PEEK occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(12):1530-1537. doi:10.1111/joor.13083
Volume 3, Issue 4, 2025
Page : 135-138
_Footer