JDSE
Journal of Dental Sciences and Education

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

eISSN: 2980-1389
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Endodontic treatment procedures applied by endodontists and general dentists in Turkiye: a survey study
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study is to determine the use of rubber dams, magnification techniques, working length measurement methods, and preferences for multiple sessions among endodontists and general dental practitioners performing root canal treatment in Turkey, as well as to evaluate disinfection and obturation protocols.
Methods: In this study, 167 dentists working in Turkey were included, and they were asked to respond to a questionnaire consisting of 17 questions covering gender, the institution they work at, specialty, the years they have been practicing, and information related to the stages of root canal treatment. The data obtained from this study were analyzed using the Chi-square test, Fisher's Exact test, and Pearson Chi-square test, based on the number of observations in the tables.
Results: Of the participants in the study, 53.89% reported attending any seminar/course related to endodontics after graduation. Additionally, 43.71% of the participants perform more than 30 root canal treatments per month. Notably, 91.02% of the participants typically perform root canal treatments on molar teeth. However, 77.25% of the participants do not use rubber dams during treatment, and 91.02% do not utilize magnification during root canal procedures. There is a statistically significant relationship between titles and the frequency of performing root canal treatments (p<0.05). Among the endodontists, 85.71% perform more than 30 root canal treatments per month, while 37.67% of general dental practitioners do the same; conversely, 18.49% of general dentists perform between 0-10 root canal treatments per month. Furthermore, there is a statistically significant relationship between titles and the use of rubber dams during root canal treatments (p<0.05). While 38.1% of endodontists and 82.88% of general dental practitioners do not use rubber dams during treatment, 14.29% of endodontists and 2.05% of general dentists always use rubber dams. Lastly, there is also a statistically significant relationship between titles and the utilization of magnification during treatment (p<0.05). While 76.19% of endodontists and 93.15% of general dental practitioners do not utilize magnification during treatment, 0.68% of general dentists occasionally use loupes or smartphone cameras for assistance.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that general dental practitioners lack sufficient knowledge regarding current irrigation and obturation protocols and materials. Additionally, it was observed that endodontists possess relatively more knowledge on this subject compared to general dental practitioners. While the efforts of practitioners to improve their perspectives on root canal treatment through education and course participation is a positive outcome, it also raises concerns about the adequacy of undergraduate education in this field.

Keywords : Endodontist, root canal treatment, general dental practitioners

Download Article


1. &Oslash;rstavik D. Apical periodontitis: microbial infection and host responses. Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Essent Endod. 2019:1-10. doi:10.1002/9781119272014.ch1
2. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16(10):498-504. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4
3. Elderton RJ. A modern approach to the use of rubber dam-1. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1971;21(6):187-193.
4. Silversin B, Shafer M, Sheiham A, Smales FC. The teaching and practice of some clinical aspects of endodontics in Great Britain. J Dent. 1975; 3(2):77-80. doi:10.1016/0300-5712(75)90004-4
5. Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J. 2000; 33(5):435-441. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00329.x
6. Kamaraj PS, Parandhaman H, Raguganesh V. Comparison of five different methods of working length determination: an: ex vivo: study. Endodontology. 2020;32(4):187-192. doi:10.4103/endo.endo_30_20
7. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am. 1967;723-744.
8. Krishnan IS, Sreedharan S. A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3(4):416-420. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.107430
9. Erten H, U&ccedil;tasli MB, Akarslan ZZ, Uzun O, Semiz M. Restorative treatment decision making with unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):55-59. doi:10. 2341/04-173
10. Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. The impact of loupes and microscopes on vision in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014;47(5):425-429. doi:10.1111/iej.12165
11. Ingle JI. A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961; 14:83-91. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(61)90477-7
12. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. J Endod. 1997;23(11):698-702. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80405-0
13. Bartols A. Clinical experiences with reciproc. Endod Pract Today. 2013; 7(3):179-187.
14. Sundqvist G. Ecology of the root canal flora. J Endod. 1992;18(9):427-430. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80842-3
15. Bystr&ouml;m A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res. 1981;89(4):321-328. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1981.tb01689.x
16. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod. 1979;5(3):83-90. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80154-5
17. Weiger R, Rosendahl R, L&ouml;st C. Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of teeth with endodontically induced periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2000;33(3):219-226. doi:10.1046/j. 1365-2591.1999.00298.x
18. Kim JW, Ha JH, Cheung GS, Versluis A, Kwak SW, Kim HC. Safety of the factory preset rotation angle of reciprocating instruments. J Endod. 2014;40(10):1671-1675. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.002
19. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995;21(3):146-151. doi:10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80441-3
20. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995;21(3):146-151. doi:10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80441-3
21. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Am J Dent. 2001;14(5):324-333.
22. Gomes BPFA, Aveiro E, Kishen A. Irrigants and irrigation activation systems in Endodontics. Braz Dent J. 2023;34(4):1-33. doi:10.1590/0103-6440202305577
23. Jensen SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW, Nicoll BK. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 1999;25(11):735-738. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80120-4
24. Villalta-Briones N, Baca P, Bravo M, et al. A laboratory study of root canal and isthmus disinfection in extracted teeth using various activation methods with a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid. Int Endod J. 2021;54(2):268-278. doi:10.1111/iej.13417
25. Virdee SS, Farnell DJJ, Silva MA, Camilleri J, Cooper PR, Tomson PL. The influence of irrigant activation, concentration and contact time on sodium hypochlorite penetration into root dentine: an ex vivo experiment. Int Endod J. 2020;53(7):986-997. doi:10.1111/iej.13290
26. Unal GC, Kaya BU, Tac AG, Kececi AD. Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: part 1. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(4):376-384.
27. Ferreira ACG, Frozoni M, Prado M, Gomes B, Signoretti F, De-Jesus-Soares A. Current trends in technological armamentarium and treatment among Brazilian endodontists. Brazil J Oral Sci. 2017;16:1-10. doi:10.20396/bjos.v16i0.8650494
28. Dindar Ds, Akiş D. Evaluation of endodontic treatment approaches of dentists in Turkiye. J Med Dent Invest. 2023;4:e230324. doi:10.5577/jomdi.e230324
29. &Uuml;nl&uuml; N, Şener S, Karabekiroğlu S. Gen&ccedil; yetişkinlerde birinci b&uuml;y&uuml;k azı dişinde &ccedil;&uuml;r&uuml;k g&ouml;r&uuml;lme sıklığı ve ağız bakım fakt&ouml;rleri ile ilişkisi. Selcuk Dent J. 2014;1(1):14-19. doi:10.15311/1441.272642
30. Bj&oslash;rndal L, Reit C. The adoption of new endodontic technology amongst Danish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J. 2005;38(1):52-58. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00904.x
31. Wong AW, Zhang S, Zhang CF, Chu CH. Perceptions of single-visit and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a survey of endodontic specialists and general dentists in Hong Kong. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016;7(3):263-271. doi:10.1111/jicd.12154
32. Madarati AA. Why dentists don&rsquo;t use rubber dam during endodontics and how to promote its usage? BMC Oral Health. 2016;16:24. doi:10.1186/s12903-016-0175-2
33. Pratten DH, McDonald NJ. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths. J Endod. 1996;22(4):173-176. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399 (96)80095-1
34. Hoer D, Attin T. The accuracy of electronic working length determination. Int Endod J. 2004;37(2):125-131. doi:10.1111/j.0143-2885. 2004.00764.x
35. Iqbal A, Akbar I, Qureshi B, Sghaireen MG, Al-Omiri MK. A survey of standard protocols for endodontic treatment in North of KSA. ISRN Dent. 2014;2014:865780. doi:10.1155/2014/865780
36. Palmer NO, Ahmed M, Grieveson B. An investigation of current endodontic practice and training needs in primary care in the north west of England. Br Dent J. 2009;206(11):E22-585. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.473
37. Meel R, Raisingani D, Prasad A, Mathur R, Madan N, Somani N. Information regarding use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments among general dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey. J Res Dent. 2016;4(1):4-8.
38. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J. 2005;38(10):743-752. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591. 2005.01010.x
39. Eleazer PD, Gilbert GH, Funkhouser E, et al. Techniques and materials used by general dentists during endodontic treatment procedures: findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(1):19-27. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2015.05.021
40. Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current trends in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners: report of a United States national survey. J Endod. 2014;40(5):618-624. doi:10.1016/j.joen. 2014.01.029
41. Ekici MA, Kıvan&ccedil; BH, Ekici A, Uzun &Ouml;. Debris removal from artificial grooves using different endodontic irrigation activation techniques: ex vivo. Acta Odontol Turcica. 2017;34(1):14-18.
42. Gupta R, Rai R. The adoption of new endodontic technology by Indian dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(11): 2610-2614. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/5817.3628
43. Kaptan RF, Haznedaroglu F, Kayahan MB, Basturk FB. An investigation of current endodontic practice in Turkey. Scient World J. 2012;2012: 565413. doi:10.1100/2012/565413
Article available in :
Volume 3, Issue 1, 2025
Page : 8-15
https://doi.org/10.51271/JDSE-0047
Article Information
Received : 20 Ara 2024
Accepted : 25 Şub 2025
Published : 28 Şub 2025
Corresponding Author :

Güliz Rana Tellioğlu Avcı: Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Batman University, Batman, Turkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Tellioğlu Avcı GR, Kılıç Gülmez H. Endodontic treatment procedures applied by endodontists and general dentists in Turkiye: a questionnaire survey. J Dent Sci Educ. 2025;3(1):8-15.

Read: 59
Cited: 0
Download : 62
_Footer