JDSE
Journal of Dental Sciences and Education

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

eISSN: 2980-1389
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Quantitative analysis of impression-taking performance - a pilot study to visualize invisible technical steps in dental procedures
Abstract
Aims: Dental procedures involve intricate techniques that can be challenging to visualize, often hindering imitation and assessment. In this study, the impression-taking performance of abutment teeth was quantitatively analyzed to create objective indexes for dental skill education.
Methods: Participants were divided into two groups of different clinical experience levels: 10 dentists and 10 dental students. An aluminum model of abutment teeth was employed to simplify the experiment. An optical motion capture system (VICON, Oxford, UK) measured participants’ movements. The impression accuracy, time length on the analyzed section, impression material pouring speed, total amount of impression material used, and syringe tip trajectory were evaluated. Fisher’s exact test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare the two groups’ results (?=0.05).
Results: In the dentist group, there were few apparent failures and a high impression accuracy. The amount of impression material dispensed tended to be larger in the dentist group, with longer practice time and slower syringe movement speed. This suggested that the inexperienced participants were sufficiently unable to pour out the impression material. The syringe tip trajectories were not significantly different between the groups. An instructor’s advice is often limited to abstract feedback; therefore, specific suggestions might assist in effective skill education.
Conclusion: It is possible to quantitatively analyze impression-taking performance and provide helpful information for dental skill education by using this system.

Keywords : Dental skill education, impression-taking, quantitative analysis, optical motion capture, practical behavior, instrument manipulation

Download Article


1. Anderson LW, Krathwhol DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a review of bloom&rsquo;s taxonomy of educational objectives. <em>Longman.</em> 2001.
2. Fayaz A, Mazahery A, Hosseinzadeh M, Yazdanpanah S. Video-based learning versus traditional method for preclinical course of complete denture fabrication. <em>J Dent (Shiraz).</em> 2015;16(1 Suppl):21-28.
3. Rystedt H, Reit C, Johansson E, Lindwall O. Seeing through the dentist&rsquo;s eyes: video-based clinical demonstrations in preclinical dental training. <em>J Dent Educ.</em> 2013;77(12):1629-1638.
4. Liu X, Liu M, Yang Y, Fan C, Tan J. Step-by-step teaching method improves the learner achievement in dental skill training. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2019;23(3):344-348.
5. Wu Q, Wang X, Jin D, et al. Validation of digital evaluation in systematic training on tooth preparation in aesthetic veneer rehabilitation.<em> Chin J Dent Res.</em> 2021;24(1):55-60.
6. Perry S, Bridges SM, Burrow MF. A review of the use of simulation in dental education. <em>Simul Healthc.</em> 2015;10(1):31-37.
7. Marshall TA, McKernan SC, Straub-Morarend CL, et al. Evidence-based dentistry skill acquisition by second-year dental students. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2018;22(3):e612-e618.
8. Satterthwaite JD, Grey NJ. Peer-group assessment of pre-clinical operative skills in restorative dentistry and comparison with experienced assessors. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2008;12(2):99-102.
9. Zou H, Jin S, Sun J, Dai Y. A cavity preparation evaluation system in the skill assessment of dental students. <em>J Dent Educ.</em> 2016;80(8):930-937.
10. Tahani B, Rashno A, Haghighi H, Monirifard R, Khomami H, Kafieh R. Automatic evaluation of crown preparation using image processing techniques: a substitute to faculty scoring in dental education. <em>J Med Signals Sens.</em> 2020;10(4):239-248.
11. Schepke U, van Wulfften Palthe ME, Meisberger EW, Kerdijk W, Cune MS, Blok B. Digital assessment of a retentive full crown preparation-an evaluation of prepCheck in an undergraduate pre-clinical teaching environment. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2020;24(3):407-424.
12. Chiang H, Staffen A, Abdulmajeed A, Janus C, Bencharit S. Effectiveness of CAD/CAM technology: a self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing exercise. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2021;25(1):50-55.
13. Kwon JW, Son SM, Lee NK. Changes of kinematic parameters of lower extremities with gait speed: 3D motion analysis study. <em>J Phys Ther Sci.</em> 2015;27(2):477-479.
14. Sato K, Usui Y, Yanagida E, Watabe S. Evaluating the use of motion capture in practicing local folk dance.<em> Int Conf Culture Computing.</em> 2017:143-144.
15. Choi W, Isaka T, Sekiguchi H, Hachimura K. Quantitative analysis of leg movement and EMG signal in expert Japanese traditional dancer. <em>Adv Hum Robot Interact.</em> 2009:165-179.
16. Green JR, Wilson EM. Spontaneous facial motility in infancy: a 3D kinematic analysis. <em>Dev Psychobiol.</em> 2006;48(1):16-28.
17. Ohlendorf D, Erbe C, Nowak J, et al. Constrained posture in dentisty-a kinematic analysis of dentists. <em>BMC Musculoskelet Disord.</em> 2017;18(1):291.
18. Hauser AM, Bowen DM. Primer on preclinical instruction and evaluation. <em>J Dent Educ.</em> 2009;73(3):390-398.
19. Abe S, Noguchi N, Matsuka Y, et al. Educational effects using a robot patient simulation system for development of clinical attitude. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2018;22(3):e327-e336.
20. Rhienmora P, Haddawy P, Suebnukarn S, Dailey MN. Intelligent dental training simulator with objective skill assessment and feedback. <em>Artifi Intell Med.</em> 2011;52(2):115-121.
21. Li Y, Ye H, Wu S, et al. Mixed reality and haptic-based dental simulator for tooth preparation: research, development, and preliminary evaluation. <em>JMIR Serious Games.</em> 2022;10(1):e30653.
22. Pang M, Zhao X, Lu D, et al. Preliminary user evaluation of a new dental technology virtual simulation system: development and validation study. <em>JMIR Serious Games.</em> 2022;10(3):e36079.
23. Yu W, Zhu Z, Su T, Weng W, Xu C. A pilot study on the use of a novel digital real-time evaluation system in undergraduate preclinical training of tooth preparation in fixed prosthodontics. <em>Eur J Dent Educ.</em> 2023;27(4):949-955.
24. Su Yin M, Haddawy P, Suebnukarn S, et al. Formative feedback generation in a VR-based dental surgical skill training simulator. <em>J Biomed Inform. </em>2021;114:103659.
Article available in :
Volume 2, Issue 3, 2024
Page : 59-63
https://doi.org/10.51271/JDSE-0036
Article Information
Received : 04 Ağu 2024
Accepted : 28 Ağu 2024
Published : 21 Eyl 2024
Corresponding Author :

Sayaka Tsuzuno: Department of General Dentistry and Clinical Education, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan

[email protected]
Citation : Tsuzuno S, Sato T, Nakamura F, Nomura M, Hasegawa M, Fujii N. Quantitative analysis of impression-taking performance-a pilot study to visualize invisible technical steps in dental procedures. J Dent Sci Educ. 2024;2(3):59-63.

Read: 180
Cited: 0
Download : 81
_Footer