JDSE
Journal of Dental Sciences and Education

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements.

eISSN: 2980-1389
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
In vitro effect of different cleaning procedures of ah plus on microtensile bond strength of immediate or delayed restoration
Abstract
Aims: Although immediate restoration is recommended after endodontic treatment, delayed restoration is still required in some cases. Also, the presence of the residual endodontic sealer in the pulp chamber may interfere with the adhesive materials and jeopardize the sealability. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of different sealer residue cleaning methods on dentin bond strength of immediate or delayed endodontic composite restoration. Methods: The occlusal surface of seven freshly extracted human molar teeth without caries were prepared to expose the flat dentin surface. Teeth were randomly divided into six experimental groups according to the cleaning method and restoration timing. Control group was not contaminated with the endodontic sealer and immediately restored (n=10). Cleaning protocols were cotton pellet soaked in saline (CPS) or cotton pellet soaked in 95% ethanol (CPE) or microbrush soaked in 95% ethanol (MBE). After removing of the sealer, a self-etching adhesive system was applied immediately (i) or delayed (d). The microtensile test applied and data were analyzed by Levene's, two way ANOVA and Tukey HSD statistical tests. Results There was no significant difference between the control group and the MBEd and CPSd groups (p>0.05). The bond strength of the CPSi, CPEi, CPEd, MBEi groups was statistically different from control (p<0.05) and there was no significant difference between these groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: CPSd and the MBEd groups showed better microtensile bond strength values than other experimental groups.

Keywords : Root canal therapy, tensile strength, root canal sealents

Download Article


1. Devroey S, Calberson F, Meire M. The efficacy of different cleaningprotocols for the sealer-contaminated access cavity. Clin Oral Investig.2020;24(11):4101-4107.
2. Hata G, Kawazoe S, Toda T, Weine FS. Sealing ability of Thermafil withand without sealer. J Endod. 1992;18(7):322-326.
3. &Oslash;rstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical,biological and clinical testing. Endod Topics. 2005;12(1):25-38.
4. Guttmann J, Witherspoon D. Obturation of the cleaned and shapedroot canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns R, eds. Pathways of the Pulp. 8thed. Mosby; 2002:293-364.
5. Parsons JR, Walton RE, Ricks-Williamson L. In vitro longitudinalassessment of coronal discoloration from endodontic sealers. J Endod.2001;27(11):699-702.
6. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Nonvitaltooth bleaching: a review of the literature and clinical procedures. JEndod. 2008;34(4):394-407.
7. Yurdag&uuml;ven H, Tanalp J, Toydemir B, Mohseni K, Soyman M, BayirliG. The effect of endodontic irrigants on the microtensile bond strengthof dentin adhesives. J Endod. 2009;35(9):1259-1263.
8. Rodr&iacute;guez-Mart&iacute;nez JB, Gonz&aacute;lez-Rodr&iacute;guez MP, Gonz&aacute;lez-L&oacute;pez S,Ferrer-Luque CM. Influence of adhesive systems on microtensile bondstrength of resin-based endodontic sealers to the root dentin. J Clin ExpDent. 2014;6(3):203-208.
9. Bandeca MC, Kuga MC, Diniz AC, Jord&atilde;o-Basso KC, Tonetto MR.Effects of the Residues from the Endodontic Sealers on the Longevity ofEsthetic Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(8):615-617.
10. Ausiello P, De Gee A, Rengo S, Davidson C. Fracture resistance ofendodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Amer J Dent.1997;10(5):237-241.
11. Ree M, Schwartz RS. The endo-restorative interface: current concepts.Dent Clin. 2010;54(2):345-374.
12. Peters OA, Teo MR, Ooi JM, Foo AS, Teoh YY, Moule AJ. The effectof different sealer removal protocols on the bond strength of AHplus-contaminated dentine to a bulk-fill composite. Aust Endod J.2020;46(1):5-10.
13. Vasiliadis L, Kodonas K, Economides N, Gogos C, Stavrianos C. Short-and long-term sealing ability of Gutta-flow and AH-Plus using an exvivo fluid transport model. Int Endod J. 2010;43(5):377-381.
14. Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorativeprocedures: review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent.2002;87(6):674-678.
15. Marin-Bauza GA, Abi Rached-Junior FJ, Souza-Gabriel AE, Sousa-NetoMD, Miranda CES, Silva-Sousa YTC. Physicochemical properties ofmethacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1531-1536.
16. Marciano MA, Guimar&atilde;es BM, Ordinola-Zapata R, et al. Physicalproperties and interfacial adaptation of three epoxy resin-basedsealers. J Endod. 2011;37(10):1417-1421.
17. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area foradhesion and tensile bond strength&mdash;evaluation of a micro-tensile bondtest. Dent Mater. 1994;10(4):236-240.
18. Cardoso PEC, Sadek FT, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Adhesion testing withthe microtensile method: effects of dental substrate and adhesivesystem on bond strength measurements. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(4):291-297.
19. Taha NA, Messer HH. Restoration of the Root-Filled Tooth. Prim DentJ. 2016;5(2):29-35.
20. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome ofprimary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature-Part2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008;41(1):6-31.
21. Muliyar S, Shameem KA, Thankachan RP, Francis P, Jayapalan C, HafizKA. Microleakage in endodontics. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):99.22. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu L-S, et al. Impact of the quality of coronalrestoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of rootcanal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod.2011;37(7):895-902.
22. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Sp&aring;ngberg LS. Endodontic treatment outcome:effect of the permanent restoration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral PatholOral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(4):576-582.
23. Safavi KE, Dowden WE, Langeland K. Influence of delayed coronalpermanent restoration on endodontic prognosis. Dent Traumatol.1987;3(4):187-191.
24. Wong AW-Y, Tsang CS-C, Zhang S, Li K-Y, Zhang C, Chu C-H.Treatment outcomes of single-visit versus multiple-visit non-surgicalendodontic therapy: a randomised clinical trial. BMC oral health.2015;15(1):1-11.
25. Carvalho MAd, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M, Del Bel Cury AA, MagneP. Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teethrestoration with the adhesive approach. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(suppl1):e74.
26. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodonticallytreated teeth. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48(2):397-416.
27. Zimmerli B, Strub M, Jeger F, Stadler O, Lussi A. Composite materials:composition, properties and clinical applications. A literature review.Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2010;120(11):972-986.
28. Korasli D, Ziraman F, Ozyurt P, Cehreli SB. Microleakage of self-etchprimer/adhesives in endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc.2007;138(5):634-640.
29. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporarycement on bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent.2006;8(1):31-34.
30. Galvan Jr RR, West LA, Liewehr FR, Pashley DH. Coronal microleakageof five materials used to create an intracoronal seal in endodonticallytreated teeth. J Endod. 2002;28(2):59-61.
31. Roberts S, Kim JR, Gu L-s, et al. The efficacy of different sealerremoval protocols on bonding of self-etching adhesives to AH Plus-contaminated dentin. J Endod. 2009;35(4):563-567.
32. Top&ccedil;uoğlu HS, Demirbuga S, Pala K, Cayabatmaz M, Top&ccedil;uoğlu G.The bond strength of adhesive resins to AH plus contaminated dentincleaned by various gutta-percha solvents. Scanning. 2015;37(2):138-144.
33. Kuga MC, Faria G, Rossi MA, et al. Persistence of epoxy-based sealerresidues in dentin treated with different chemical removal protocols.Scanning. 2013;35(1):17-21.
34. de Oliveira E, Cecchin D, Miyagaki DC, et al. Effect of differentprotocols of eugenol removal on the bond strength between the fibrepost and root dentin. Aust Endod J. 2019;45(2):177-183.
Article available in :
Volume 1, Issue 3, 2023
Page : 90-94
https://doi.org/10.51271/JDSE-0015
Article Information
Received : 01 Eyl 2023
Accepted : 29 Eyl 2023
Published : 30 Eyl 2023
Corresponding Author :

Türkay Kölüş: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Treatment, Karaman, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Kölüş T, Kahveci Ö. In vitro effect of different cleaning procedures of ah plus on microtensile bond strength of immediate or delayed restoration. J Dent Sci Educ. 2023;1(3):90-94.

Read: 171
Cited: 0
Download : 64
_Footer