JDSE
Journal of Dental Sciences and Education

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

eISSN: 2980-1389
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Review
Short dental implants
Abstract
Short dental implants have been successfully used to support single and multiple fixed reconstructions in atrophic jaws, despite an increased crown-to-implant ratio. The use of short dental implants allows the treatment of patients for whom complex surgical techniques cannot be performed for medical, anatomical, or financial reasons. Furthermore, the use of short dental implants in clinical practice reduces morbidity, cost, and treatment time and reduces the need for complex surgery. The aim of this review is to evaluate the survival rates of short and extra-short dental implants and to discuss the impact of an increased crown-to-implant ratio on biologic and technical complications.

Keywords : Dental implants, implant-supported dental prosthesis, survival rate

Download Article


1. Chaushu G, Taicher S, Halamish-Shani T, Givol N. Medicolegal aspectsof altered sensation following implant placement in the mandible. Int JOral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(3):413-415.
2. Friberg B. The posterior maxilla: clinical considerations and currentconcepts using Branemark System implants. Periodontol 2000.2008;47(1):67-78.
3. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, WorthingtonHV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical boneaugmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematicreview. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2(3):167-184.
4. Esposito M, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. Rehabilitation of posterioratrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implantsor by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilotrandomised clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(1):21-30.
5. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume.Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):72- 96.
6. Ravida A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Tavelli L,Wang HL. Long-term effectiveness of extra-short (≤6 mm) dentalimplants: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):68-84.
7. Al-Sawaf O, Tuna T, Rittich A, Kern T, Wolfart S. Randomized clinicaltrial evaluating the effect of splinting crowns on short implants in themandible 3 years after loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(11):1061-1071.
8. Taschieri S, Lolato A, Testori T, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M. Short dentalimplants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure forthe rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: three-year results ofa randomized clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(1):9-20.
9. Tang Y, Yu H, Wang J, Gao M, Qiu L. Influence of crown-to-implantratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions ofshort implants in posterior regions: a 4-year retrospective clinical andradiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(1):119-127.
10. Ku JK, Kim IH, Lee JG, Kim YK. Long-term clinical evaluation of shortimplants on posterior partially edentulous areas: a 14-year retrospectivestudy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(1):131-136.
11. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacingmissing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;13(5):CD008397.
12. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Husler J, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. EAOSupplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 short implants versussinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: asystematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(Suppl 11):154-169.
13. Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, Gholami H, Pagni S, WeberHP. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared withimplants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: a meta-analysis. ClinOral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):8-20.
14. Badaro MM, Mendoza Marin DO, Pauletto P, Simek Vega GoncalvesTM, Porporatti AL, De Luca Canto G. Failures in single extra-shortimplants (≤6 mm): a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants. 2021;36(4):669-689.
15. Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crown to-implantratios of short-length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36:425-433.
16. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospectivestudy of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region II: Influenceof the crown to implant ratio and different prosthetic treatmentmodalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):707-714
17. Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, DeporterD. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulouspatients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(1):69-76.
18. Schneider D, Witt L, Hammerle CH. Influence of the crown-to-implantlength ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting singlecrown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):169-174.
19. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameterson the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants. 2006;21(2):275-282.
20. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single toothimplant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(1):1-5.
21. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect thesurvival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? Asystematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):67-72.
Article available in :
Volume 1, Issue 3, 2023
Page : 95-97
https://doi.org/10.51271/JDSE-0016
Article Information
Received : 22 Eyl 2023
Accepted : 29 Eyl 2023
Published : 30 Eyl 2023
Corresponding Author :

Meltem Karşıyaka Hendek: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Periodontoloji Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Hendek MK, Barış K, Olgun E. Short dental implants J Dent Sci Educ. 2023;1(3):95-97.

Read: 317
Cited: 0
Download : 174
_Footer